Amazingly, all the balls in yesterday’s $250 million Mega Millions drawing were above 31. As I mentioned before, this had happened only four times before in the fifteen-year history of the Powerball and Mega Millions lotteries.
The winning numbers were 37, 40, 48, 53, 56, with Megaball 44.
I did have a ticket for this drawing, even though I only buy a couple lottery tickets a year. All the numbers on my ticket were above 31, as usual, but I matched only two balls: 37 and 40.
Nobody matched all six balls, so I wasn’t the only loser. The prize pool rolls over to Friday’s drawing, with an estimated jackpot of $325 million ($191 million cash value).
The multi-state lotteries are in the news again. On Saturday an Indiana Powerball ticket won the $314 million jackpot ($142 million cash value). There is a $250 million ($146 cash value) Mega Millions drawing tonight.
But the reason I’m writing is because I read in a New York Times blog that “studies and statisticians have varied opinions over the precise long-shot odds of actually winning a huge lottery prize.”
Of course, the odds of winning the jackpot are precisely known. Each Mega Millions ticket has a 1 in 175,711,536 chance. Each Powerball ticket has a slightly better 1 in 146,107,962 chance. There are no dissenting opinions.
The quote might make sense if we’re talking about continually buying tickets and cumulative odds with respect to some ‘huge’ threshold amount, or if we’re considering something like the possibility that a winning ticket will have to split the jackpot.
The author compares lottery odds to death-by-lightning odds. Perhaps he intended to say that statisticians have varied opinions over the precise long-shot odds of being killed by lightning. Now that I can believe.
[edit: The story has been amended and now reads “Studies and statisticians give varied calculations for the precise odds of actually winning or splitting a huge lottery prize.” emphasis added]
I see this sight often when I walk around at the office.
Maybe it’s just me, but it’s almost always good for a chuckle.
The login window obscures the entire face yet the little guy’s chin, forehead, and both ears are visible. It couldn’t have turned out better on purpose.